Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): July 2026
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Can quantity of technology use and Efl teachers’ teaching experience determine student engagement in language education? A quantitative replication and extension study

Authors

Betül Yoldaş
Received: 2026-06-19
Accepted: 2026-07-10
Published: 2026-07-09

Abstract

The present quantitative research was intended to be written to replicate and extend a previous qualitative study by Yoldaş (2026) to make its results reliable and systematic through multiple linear regression analysis. Previous study focused on EFL teachers’ own technology use and its impact on their students’ engagement. Using JAMOVI software, previous results were transformed into numerical data with this study. A multiple linear regression analysis was administered to explore whether technology use frequency and teachers’ teaching experience had an effect on student engagement. Subsequent to data analysis, it was found that both variables had negative impact on student engagement in language education, proving that instead of focusing on teachers’ technology use frequency, quality of education should be taken into consideration to improve education. Even though pilot study limited the reliability and generalizability of the outcome due to its nature, the study gave insightful outcome for contemporary language teaching with statistical data.

Keywords:

multiple linear regression student engagement teaching experience digital pedagogy educational technology adoption technology use in language education

References

Akay, C., Haidari, S. M., & Yelken, T. Y. (2019). Technology-enhanced Self-directed Language Learning Behaviors of EFL Student Teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.590003

Alakrash, H. M., & Razak, N. A. (2021). Technology-Based Language Learning: Investigation of Digital Technology and Digital Literacy. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112304

Alzahrani, F. (2023). Is It True They Negatively Engage? Mixed Method Research of Student Engagement in EFL Online Classrooms. Journal of Language and Education. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.13736

Bećirović, S., Brdarević-Čeljo, A., & Delić, H. (2021). The use of digital technology in foreign language learning. SN Social Sciences, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00254-y

Bond, C., Lancaster, G. A., Campbell, M., Chan, C., Eddy, S., Hopewell, S., Mellor, K., Thabane, L., & Eldridge, S. (2023). Pilot and feasibility studies: Extending the conceptual framework. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01233-1

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11, 589-597.

https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2020). Utilizing a mixed methods approach for conducting interventional evaluations. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820912856

Field, A.P. (2018) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th Edition, Sage, Newbury Park.

Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2023). car: Companion to Applied Regression. [R package]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=car.

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Guo, Y., Xu, J., & Chen, C. (2022). Measurement of engagement in the foreign language classroom and its effect on language achievement: the case of Chinese college EFL students. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 0. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0118

Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

https://www.cengage.uk/c/multivariate-data-analysis-8e-hair-babin-anderson-black/9781473756540/?searchIsbn=9781473756540

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Han, R., Alibakhshi, G., Lu, L., & Labbafi, A. (2024). Digital communication activities and EFL learners' willingness to communicate and engagement: Exploring the intermediate language learners’ perceptions. Heliyon, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25213

Hanifah, R., Setyaningsih, E., & Sumardi, S. (2022). Efl Students’ Engagement During Emergency Remote Teaching: Does Technology Matter? Journal of Languages and Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i1.4188

Lepp M, Luik P and Tark TM (2022) How Can Web Lessons Be Taught to Reduce Screen Fatigue, Motivational, and Concentration Problems in Different Disciplines?. Front. Sociol. 7:871770. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.871770

Li, G., Sun, Z., & Jee, Y. (2019). The more technology the better? A comparison of teacher-student interaction in high and low technology use elementary EFL classrooms in China. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.003

Ljalikova, A., Heero, A., Anspal, T., Saar, M., Väljataga, T., Meristo, M., & Batrakova, E. (2025). Conceptualizing and enhancing student engagement through technology: Perspectives from foreign language teachers in Estonia. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251392992

Lokollo, N. C. E., & Mali, Y. C. G. (2024). Speak More, Students! Harnessing Technology for Active Students' Engagement in EFL English-Speaking Classes. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v18i1.12653

Lu, C., Bulut, O., Demmans Epp, C., & Gierl, M. (2025). Impacts of engagement on academic outcomes in technology-enhanced learning. Distance Education, 46(2), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2024.2373297

Ma’rifah, U., Masrifah, N., & Arifani, Y. (2021). Technological Use in EFL Instruction: Investigating Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs and Students’ Learning Engagement. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya. https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.11.1.2021.17-32

Metaria, M., & Cahyono, B. (2024). EFL students’ engagement in the post-pandemic teaching: Does technology matter?. Journal on English as a Foreign Language. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v14i1.6503

Nhan, L. K. (2024). Investigating EFL English-Majored Students’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Communication Language Teaching. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT). https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24oct1638

Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative Research Methods. In The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (pp. 505-521). Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-28

Purnawati, P., Rafli, Z., & Setiadi, S. (2024). The Students’ Engagement in Foreign Language Learning through ICT Incorporation. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v9i1.1281

R Core Team (2024). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.4) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org. (R packages retrieved from CRAN snapshot 2024-08-07).

Saqr, M., López-Pernas, S., Helske, S., & Hrastinski, S. (2023). The longitudinal association between engagement and achievement varies by time, students’ profiles, and achievement state: A full program study. Computers & Education, 199, 104787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104787

Souza, R. D. (2021). Language Teachers’ Pedagogical Orientations in Integrating Technology in the Online Classroom: Its Effect on Students Motivation and Engagement. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT). https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i10.5268

Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261-292.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5

Teng, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). The effect of two educational technology tools on student engagement in Chinese EFL courses. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00263-0

The jamovi project (2024). jamovi. (Version 2.6) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.

Ting, H., Memon, M. A., Thurasamy, R., & Cheah, J.-H. (2025). Snowball sampling: A review and guidelines for survey research. Asian Journal of Business Research, 15(1), 1–?. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.250186

Trust, T. (2018). Why Do We Need Technology in Education? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(2), 54–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1442073

Yoldaş, B. (2026). Investigating EFL teachers’ perceptions of technology use on student engagement: A pilot study in Türkiye. Journal of Language, Literature, Social, and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.58881/jllscs.v4i1.457

Zhang, Y., & Miao, Z. (2025). Enhancing EFL Learners' Engagement and Motivation Through Immersive Technologies: The Role of Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Mobile Applications. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70128

Zhou, C., & Hou, F. (2024). Can AI Empower L2 Education? Exploring Its Influence on the Behavioural, Cognitive and Emotional Engagement of EFL Teachers and Language Learners. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12750

Author Biography

Betül Yoldaş, Ankara Social Sciences University, TURKEY

Author Origin : Turkey

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Yoldaş, B. (2026). Can quantity of technology use and Efl teachers’ teaching experience determine student engagement in language education? A quantitative replication and extension study. Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies, 4(2), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.58881/jllscs.v4i2.478

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.