Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): July 2026
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

The difference between artificial intelligence implicatures and human implicatures in conversation

Authors

Raghad Hawarin , Dr. Mahmod Eshreateh

Additional Files

Received: 2026-06-07
Accepted: 2026-07-10
Published: 2026-07-09

Abstract

This research investigates the pragmatic differences between conversational implicatures produced by artificial intelligence systems and those generated by humans in everyday conversation. Grounded in Grice’s Cooperative Principle and its four conversational maxims—quantity, quality, relation, and manner—the study analyzes how implicatures emerge, function, and are interpreted in human–human and human–AI "chat GPT" interactions. Adopting a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach, the study examines ten conversational exchanges: five human conversations and five AI-based conversations. The analysis reveals that while artificial intelligence can simulate implicature-like meanings, these implicatures often lack intentionality, contextual sensitivity, and shared socio-cultural grounding. In contrast, human implicatures are deeply rooted in communicative intention, contextual awareness, and social norms. The findings contribute to pragmatic studies and human–AI "chat GPT" communication by highlighting the fundamental pragmatic gap between artificial and human conversational behavior.

Keywords:

conversational implicature artificial intelligence human communication human–AI interaction natural language processing (NLP)

References

Aziz, A. L. A. A. (2025). AI and Pragmatics: Do Chatbots Follow Speech Acts & Maxims? Evaluating AI-Generated Conversations Using Pragmatics. مجلة واسط للعلوم الانسانية. https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.vol21.iss3.1012

Chen, X., Li, J., & Ye, Y. (2024). A feasibility study of AI-generated conversations in pragmatic analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 213, 45–58. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=AI- generated+conversations+in+pragmatic+analysis

Di Maro, M., Di Bratto, M., Mennella, S., Origlia, A., & Cutugno, F. (2025). Argumentation in recommender dialogue agents (ARDA): An unexpected journey from Pragmatics to conversational agents. Open Linguistics, 11. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2025-0052

George, E. J., & Mamidi, R. (2019). Conversational implicatures in English dialogue: Annotated dataset. ArXiv, abs/1911.10704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.251

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Grice+1975+Logic+and+Conversation

Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. (2019). Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human–Machine Communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22, 70 - 86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819858691

Hill, J., Ford, W. R., & Farreras, I. G. (2015). Real conversations with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human-human online conversations and human-chatbot conversations. Comput. Hum. Behav., 49, 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.026

Horn, L. R. (2004). Implicature. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 3–28). Blackwell Publishing.

Hota, A., & Jokinen, J. P. P. (2025). Implicature in Interaction: Understanding Implicature Improves Alignment in Human-LLM Interaction. ArXiv, abs/2510.25426. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.25426

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Horn+2004+Implicature+Handbook+of+Pragmatics

Hu, J., Yao, X., Huang, Z., Liang, D., Yang, D., Liu, D., Li, J., Zhang, Y., & X. (2026). From Human Pragmatic Language Skills to Conversational Agent Design: A Systematic Review of Transfer Strategies. Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3792787

Huang, Y. (2017). Pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Huang+2017+Pragmatics+2nd+edition

Kasirzadeh, A., & Gabriel, I. (2022). In Conversation with Artificial Intelligence: Aligning language Models with Human Values. Philosophy & Technology, 36, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347- 023-00606-x

Kim, Z. M., Lee, J., & Park, S. (2023). Is the Pope Catholic? Applying chain-of-thought reasoning to understanding conversational implicatures. (pp.1–15). https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.13826

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Levinson+1983+Pragmatics

Li, H., Zhu, S., & Zheng, Z. (2023). Diplomat: A Dialogue Dataset for Situated Pragmatic Reasoning. ArXiv, abs/2306.09030. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.09030

Liang, C., Proft, J., Andersen, E., & Knepper, R. A. (2019). Implicit Communication of Actionable Information in Human-AI teams. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300325

Marconi, L., Longo, L., & Cabitza, F. (2026). Assessing Interaction Quality in Human-AI Dialogue: An Integrative Review and Multi-Layer Framework for Conversational Agents. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr., 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/make8020028

Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Mey+2001+Pragmatics+An+Introduction

Miehling, E. (2024). Conversational maxims for human–AI interactions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). (pp.14420–14436). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Conversational+maxims+for+human– AI+interactions+Miehling+2024

Ningsih, T. W. R., Lestari, I., & Saptono, D. (2025). Dialogue In The Digital Age: A Comparison Of Human Podcasts And Ai Chatbots Through Content And Narrative Analysis. Prosiding Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya (KOLITA). https://doi.org/10.25170/kolita.v23i23.7181

Paranjape, A., & Manning, C. D. (2021). Human-like informative conversations: Better acknowledgements using conditional mutual information. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). (pp.n.p).

Qiu, Z., Duan, X., & Cai, Z. G. (2023). Does ChatGPT Resemble Humans in Processing Implicatures?.

Rappa, N. A., Tang, K.-S., & Cooper, G. (2025). Human–AI communication through a Gricean lens. Language Sciences, 98, 101615. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Human– AI+communication+through+a+Gricean+lens

Ruis, L., Khan, A., Biderman, S., Hooker, S., Rocktaschel, T., & Grefenstette, E. (2022). The Goldilocks of Pragmatic Understanding: Fine-Tuning Strategy Matters for Implicature Resolution by LLMs.

Rusk, J. H., Choung, H., & Smith, N. (2022). A fine-grained comparison of pragmatic language understanding in humans and language models. (pp.1–20). https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.06801

Salman, Y., & Matrood, D. (2025). Conversational implicature in human–AI interactions: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatic Studies, 12(3), 45–62. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Conversational+implicature+in+human– AI+interactions

Salman, Y., & Matrood, D. (2025). Conversational Implicature in Human-AI Interactions. Frontiers in Global Research. https://doi.org/10.55559/fgr.v1i3.22

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Searle+1969+Speech+Acts

Shehab, E., & Badah, A. (2026). Translating Conversational Implicatures: A Comparative Study of Human and Artificial Intelligence Performance in Arabic–English Literary Translation. Translation Review, 124, 38 - 54. https://doi.org/10.1080/07374836.2026.2617670

Tsvilodub, P., Marty, P., Ramotowska, S., Romoli, J., & Franke, M. (2024). Experimental Pragmatics with Machines: Testing LLM Predictions for the Inferences of Plain and Embedded Disjunctions. ArXiv, abs/2405.05776. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.05776

Van Pinxteren, M., Pluymaekers, M., & Lemmink, J. (2020). Human-like communication in conversational agents: a literature review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-06-2019-0175

Yue, S., Song, S., Cheng, X., & Hu, H. (2024). Do Large Language Models Understand Conversational Implicature- A case study with a Chinese sitcom. ArXiv, abs/2404.19509. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2404.19509

Yue, S., Zhang, L., & Li, H. (2024). Do large language models understand conversational implicature? A case study. (pp.1–18).. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19509

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Zheng, Z., Qiu, S., Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Zhu, S.-C. (2021). GRICE: A Grammar-based Dataset for Recovering Implicature and Conversational rEasoning. 2074-2085. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.182

Author Biographies

Raghad Hawarin, Hebron University PALESTINE

Author Origin : Palestine, State of

Dr. Mahmod Eshreateh , Hebron University PALESTINE

Author Origin : Palestine, State of

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Hawarin, R., & Eshreateh , D. M. (2026). The difference between artificial intelligence implicatures and human implicatures in conversation. Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies, 4(2), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.58881/jllscs.v4i2.475

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.