Beyond simple T/V distinctions: Investigating Balti personal pronouns as markers of social distance, authority, and communal solidarity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58881/jllscs.v4i1.431Keywords:
Balti personal pronouns, authority relations, address forms, communal solidarity, power and solidarity, social distanceAbstract
The study was aimed at examining the sociolinguistic role of the pronouns in the Balti language and how they are used to express power and solidarity relations within the Balti community in Baltistan. Using the theoretical framework of Brown and Gilman (1960), this qualitative study uses a purposive sampling technique, whereby it applied of semi-structured interviews and observation data collected among native speakers (Balti Poets). It is in the analysis of specific variants of pronouns, including formal and informal pronoun forms of "you" (e.g. Yaang and Khyang) that speakers strategically use to maneuver in social discourses. Results showed that the use of pronouns is regulated by the contextual factors such as age, social status, formality of the environment, and the type of relationship between these people. Formal pronouns indicate respect and power (authority) to elder ones and those in higher positions vice versa, the informal pronouns promote authority, intimacy and equality (solidarity) among equals and family members within discourses. The study highlighted that Balti pronouns play a pivotal role in shaping social identity and upholding the cultural rules of respect, integrity and strengthening social ties in the targeted situations. The study would be supportive for the researchers preserve the Balti language and further advance the sociolinguistic studies by illustrating the ever-changing nature of language and social structure in a distinctly unique settings accordingly.
Downloads
References
Alatabi, F. (2022). Generic pronouns in English and Arabic. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. ISBN 978-620-4-98381-3
Alharbi, A., & Rucker, M. (2023). Discursive practices of the performative theory of solidarity discourse. Language Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2022.101515.
Alharbi, T. (2015). A socio-pragmatic study of forms of address and terms of reference in Classical Arabic as represented in the Chapter of Joseph in the Holy Quran.
Ali, S., & Baig, M. Q. (2024). Tense and aspect in Balti language: Morphological perspective. Journal of Asian Development Studies, *13*(1), 795–803. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.1.66
AliAkbariHamed, L., Behnam, B., & Saeidi, M. (2020). Linguistic Devices of Identity Representation in English Political Discourse with a Focus on Personal Pronouns: Power and Solidarity. Applied Linguistics, 13, 205-229. https://doi.org/10.30495/jal.2020.677911.
Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., & Yitmen, I. (2025). Crafting research questions, objectives, and aims. In A. Almusaed, A. Almssad, & I. Yitmen (Eds.), Practice of research methodology in civil engineering and architecture (pp. 63–86). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97393-2_4
Anderson, M. (1998). The development of grammatical case distinctions in the use of personal pronouns by Spanishspeaking preschoolers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 41, 394–406.
Bolaji, Ezekiel & Sanni, Rifqat & Adebanjo, Omowunmi. (2014). Patterns of Codeswitching in Mixed Yoruba- English Interrogative Sentences. Journal of Cognitive Science. 15. 259-286. 10.17791/jcs.2014.15.2.259.
Boyeldieu, P. (2020). Personal pronouns in Bua languages. , 1, 292-335. https://doi.org/10.37892/2686-8946-2020-1-3-292-335.
Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253–276). The MIT Press.
Buyle, A., & Smet, H. (2018). Meaning in a changing paradigm: the semantics of you and the pragmatics of thou (submitted). Language Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.12.004.
Crystal, D. (2008). Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (6th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444302776
Doe, J. (2025). What pronouns do you use? The pronoun-sharing practice from an (im)politeness perspective. Journal of Politeness Research, *21*(3), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2024-0057
Ezzaytouni, M. L. (n.d). ENGLISH SYNTAX: Andrew Radford.
Fleming, L. (2022). Dispensing with Europe: A comparative linguistic anthropology of honorific pronouns. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12386.
Fleming, L., & Sidnell, J. (2020). The Typology and Social Pragmatics of Interlocutor Reference Across Asian Speech Communities. Journal of Asian Linguistic Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.47298/jala.v1-i1-a1.
Fukumura, K., Zhang, S., Bhatia, S., & Husain, S. (2025). Gender effects on non-gendered pronouns in Hindi and Mandarin Chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251348218
Haber, M. (2025). [Chapter title]. In [Editor(s) Name(s)] (Eds.), Attack vectors (pp. XXX– XXX). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-1709-0_19
Idrizi, F., & Çeliku, A. (2025). Personal pronouns with contrastive approach German-Albanian-Englisch. A discursive analysis. South Florida Journal of Development. https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv6n3-017.
Jäggi, T., Gygax, P., Decock, S., Gabriel, U., Hoof, S., Verhaegen, H., & Vincent, C. (2025). Beyond She and He: A Framework for Studying the Cognitive, Psychological and Social Effects of Gender- Neutral Pronouns. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 44, 850-880. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x251346193.
Kacewicz, E., Pennebaker, J. W., & Graesser, A. C. (Year). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Kulbayeva, A. (2020). Balancing power and solidarity through indirectness: A case study of Russian and Kazakh meeting chairs. Journal of Politeness Research, 16, 159 - 191. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr- 2017-0054.
Lamidi, T. (2008). Pronoun choice and grammaticality in Yoruba-English code-switching. https://scispace.com/pdf/pronoun-choice-and-grammaticality-in-yoruba-english-code- 2euce4azzf.pdf
Madut, K. K. (2025). Sociological perspectives on cultural and religious norms influencing child marriage in South Sudan. In E. Chitando & B. Stanwire (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of religion, health and development in Africa (pp. 1–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62891-7_17-1
Maryam, F., Niazi, S. & Ali, A. L. (2024). Tense and Aspect in Balti Language: Morphological Perspective. Journal of Asian Development Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.1.66
Mustafa, M, Ali, L. M, & Ayub, Sadia (2024). Contrastive analysis with QDA Miner Lite: A qualitative study of Balti and English syntactic process. Journal of Data and Computational Analysis, *8*(9), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.71058/jodac.v8i9023
Myers-Scotton, C. (2005). Supporting a Differential Access Hypothesis: Code Switching and Other Contact Data. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 326–348). Oxford University Press.
Pfaff, Carol. (1979). Constraints on Language Mixing: Intrasentential Code-Switching and Borrowing in Spanish/English. Language. 55. 291. 10.2307/412586.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Mustafa, Zulfiqar Ali, Dr. Muhammad Essa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
