Revisiting a choq pa bursting shargo (women: the miserable): Feminist critique in Balti folktale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58881/jllscs.v3i1.234Keywords:
balti language, folktale, feminism, balti folktales, folkloreAbstract
This study examines the Balti folktale “Choqpa Bursting Shargo” through a feminist lens, focusing on the representation of female characters and their societal roles. The research aims to explore gender roles, major themes, and the portrayal of patriarchal structures in the narrative. It highlights the elements of oppression and the marginalization of women in a male-dominated society, drawing attention to the societal norms that perpetuate gender inequality. The study employs a qualitative approach, utilizing feminist literary criticism to analyse the folktale. The research is based on textual analysis, examining key themes and character interactions to reveal underlying patriarchal ideologies. The methodology involves identifying patterns of gender discrimination and assessing their implications within the broader socio-cultural framework. The analysis reveals that women in the folktale are subjected to systemic oppression and are often portrayed in subservient roles. The narrative reflects the realities of patriarchal norms, illustrating how female identity is suppressed and controlled. The concept of double marginalization is also explored, emphasizing how women face compounded oppression both as individuals and as a collective. In conclusion, the research underscores the significance of feminist readings of folklore in unveiling deep-seated gender biases. The study highlights the continued relevance of such tales in contemporary discussions on gender equality, advocating for a more inclusive and equitable representation of women in traditional narratives.
Downloads
References
Abrams, M. H. (1999). A glossary of literary terms (7th ed.). Earl McPeek.
Alcoff, L. M. (1995). Is the feminist critique of reason rational? Philosophical Topics, 23(2), 1–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43154206.
Baker, C. D. (2013). Feminist poststructuralism and folklore studies: Re-imagining the gendered voice in folklore. Folklore, 124(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587X.2013.792713.
Beasley, C. (1999). What is feminism, anyway? Understanding contemporary feminist thought. Westview Press.
Beldecos, A., et al. (1988). The importance of feminist critique for contemporary cell biology. Hypatia, 3(1), 61–76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3810051.
Berggren, K. (2018). Is everything compatible? A feminist critique of Hearn’s composite approach to men and masculinity. Australian Feminist Studies, 33(97), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2018.1542590.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2022). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Polity Press.
Carmi, E. (2021). A feminist critique of digital consent. Seminar.net, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.4291.
Chadwick, R. (2024). The question of feminist critique. Feminist Theory, 25(3), 376-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001231186526.
Chessé, A., & Sondarjee, M. (2024). A feminist critique of international practices. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2), Article sqae009. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae009.
Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. University of California Press.
Chowdhury, S., Dey, K., Rahman, A. S., & Mitra, S. (2017). Gender in South Asian folklore: A comparative study. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 15(1), 41–60.
Cixous, H. (1976). The laugh of the Medusa. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(4), 875–893.
Cohen, R. (1976). Folklore studies in the twentieth century: A view from the ‘70s. Journal of American Folklore.
Creed, B. (1994). The monstrous-feminine: Film, feminism, psychoanalysis. Routledge.
DeMarco, R., Campbell, J., & Wuest, J. (1993). Feminist critique: Searching for meaning in research. ANS: Advances in Nursing Science, 16(2), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-199312000-00004.
Dermer, S. B., Hemesath, C. W., & Russell, C. S. (1998). A feminist critique of solution-focused therapy. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 26(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189808251103.
Dundes, A. (1980). Interpreting folklore. Indiana University Press.
Farneubun, P. (2018). Feminist critiques against traditional approaches to security. Global Strategis, 9(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.9.1.2015.19-36.
Ferber, M. A. (1995). The study of economics: A feminist critique. The American Economic Review, 85(2), 357–361. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117948.
Giallorenzi, M. L. (2017). Crítica feminista sobre la noción de la buena madre. Revista Reflexiones, 96(1), 87-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rr.v96i1.30634.
Gregg, N. (1987). Reflections on the feminist critique of objectivity. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 11(1), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/019685998701100102.
Haase, D. (Ed.). (2004). Fairy tales and feminism: New approaches. Wayne State University Press.
Horner, A., & Sellers, S. (Eds.). (2005). Feminist readings/feminist writers: A critical guide to contemporary feminist narratives.
Kansal, S. (2022). Feminist critique to international law. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4336216.
Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. Columbia University Press.
Krolokke, C., & Sorensen, A. (2005). Three waves of feminism: From suffragettes to girls' power. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1964). The structural study of myth. Journal of Folklore Research, 1(2), 35–45.
Mhamane, V. N. (2021). A critique of twentieth-century feminist criticism. The Creative Launcher, 6(4), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.53032/tcl.2021.6.4.18.
Mohanty, C. T. (2006). US empire and the project of women’s studies: Stories of citizenship, complicity, and dissent. Gender, Place, and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 13(1), 7–20.
Spivak, G. (1998). Feminist literary criticism. In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-N023-1.
Tatar, M. (1999). The hard facts of the Grimms' fairy tales (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Tong, R. (2009). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (3rd ed.). Westview Press.
Tuchman, G. (1978). Hearth and home: Images of women in the mass media. Oxford University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006.
Warner, M. (1994). From the beast to the blonde: On fairy tales and their tellers. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Blackwell.
Wiegman, R. (2012). Object lessons. Duke University Press.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zipes, J. (2006). Why fairy tales stick: The evolution and relevance of a genre. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mairaj Ahmed, Muhammad Issa, Muhammad Mustafa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
